Smart Investor: How to use US index options to manage volatility during the US elections: a beginner's guide

Put debit spread: a more cost-effective protection

To optimize this hedging approach, you can consider a put debit spread, which provides downside protection at a reduced cost. This strategy involves buying a put with a strike price closer to the current index level, but then selling a lower-strike put to help offset the cost.

For example, instead of buying the 5,510 strike put outright, you could purchase a higher strike put (e.g., 5,600) and sell a 5,500 strike put. The net cost of this spread is significantly lower at $1,220 ($12.20 * 100) compared to the $3,230 cost of the standalone put.

While this approach limits your maximum profit to the difference between the two strikes (i.e., $10,000 – $1,220 = $8,780), it still offers sufficient protection for a 5% market drop. In this scenario, the maximum profit would be realized if the S&P 500 falls to or below 5,500 by expiration. Since you don’t expect a drop deeper than 5%, this trade balances affordability with effective downside protection.

B. Profiting from an upside movement: calls and credit spreads

Election results don’t just trigger market downturns; they can also result in sharp upward movements if the market reacts favorably. One straightforward way to profit from such a scenario is to buy a long call option, which allows you to benefit from a rising market.

Long call:

However, the break-even point for this call option is 5,929.10, meaning the S&P 500 would need to surpass that level before you start realizing profits. Given that the market is currently trading at around 5,800, it would require a substantial upswing to make this trade worthwhile before expiration. While it’s possible, this is a highly speculative trade with considerable cost upfront.

So, what if we want a strategy that increases our probability of profit while reducing the upfront cost?

Put credit spread:

Instead of relying solely on a long call, a put credit spread offers an alternative, more probability-driven way to profit from an upward move. This strategy involves selling a put with a higher strike price and simultaneously buying a put with a lower strike price. The goal is to collect the net premium from the trade, which would be profitable as long as the index stays above the higher strike price.

In the attached example of the put credit spread, you sell a 5,700 strike put and buy a 5,650 strike put, both expiring on November 15th. Here’s how this strategy works:

• You receive a net premium of $1,030 ($10.30 * 100) by selling the 5,700 put and buying the 5,650 put.
• The maximum risk is $3,970 ($5,000 strike difference - $1,030 premium received).
• The maximum profit is the premium collected: $1,030.
• The break-even point is 5,689.70 (higher strike minus premium received).

In this case, as long as the S&P 500 stays above 5,700, you keep the full premium and make your maximum profit of $1,030. If the market does drop below 5,700, the loss is capped at $3,970, which is significantly lower than the risk involved in the long call strategy.

By implementing the put credit spread, you take advantage of the expectation that the market will stay neutral to positive after the election, while limiting the capital at risk compared to a pure long call option. It’s a more probability-driven strategy, offering a better risk-reward profile for a potential election-related market surge.

4. Timing is crucial: when to implement these strategies

• Pre-election: As election day approaches, implied volatility rises, increasing option prices. This is the ideal time to implement protective puts or credit spreads to hedge or profit from the expected volatility.
• Election night and post-election: For traders looking to capitalize on short-term volatility, election night can offer sudden market swings. Zero DTE (days-to-expiration) options allow you to capture rapid price changes during this time, but they carry significant risk.

5. Key risks to keep in mind

• Implied volatility risk: Higher volatility makes options more expensive. If the market doesn’t move as much as expected, you could lose the premium paid for the options, especially in strategies like long calls or protective puts, where substantial movement is required for profitability.
• Expiration risk: Options have a finite lifespan. If the market doesn’t move before the options expire, they may lose their value. Timing trades around key events such as debates, election day, or polling results is essential to maximize the effectiveness of your strategies.
• Limited upside with spreads: Strategies like put debit spreads and put credit spreads limit both your maximum risk and potential profit. While these strategies are cost-effective, they cap the upside, so choosing appropriate strike prices and understanding the risk-reward balance is critical.

Note on liquidity and spreads

While these index options offer broad market exposure and effective tools for managing volatility, it's important to note that some of these products may have wider bid-ask spreads. A wide spread can indicate lower liquidity, meaning there are fewer buyers and sellers actively trading the product. This can make it costly to enter and exit trades, as the price difference between buying and selling can be substantial. In such cases, trading these options may not always be viable, as the costs associated with the spread can reduce or eliminate potential profitability.

Conclusion

The upcoming US elections present both risks and opportunities for traders. By using index options like SPX, NDX, and RUT, you can hedge your portfolio, capitalize on price swings, or profit from election-driven volatility. Understanding strategies like protective puts, put debit spreads, long calls, and put credit spreads can help you navigate the uncertainty surrounding the election season. With these tools, you’ll be better equipped to manage market volatility confidently and strategically.